![]() There are plenty of other crimes that the Justice Department should be focused on. First, he noted that non-violent, low-level cannabis enforcement is not an effective use of federal law enforcement resources. Judge Garland recognized two realities about cannabis enforcement-one not new to AG nominees, the other quite new. We can look at our charging policies and stop charging the highest possible offense with the highest possible sentence.” ![]() “We can focus our attention on violent crimes and other crimes…and not allocate our resources to something like marijuana possession. It will make it impossible…to get a job and will lead to a downward economic spiral. That is wrong and it’s the kind of problem that will then follow a person for the rest of their lives. Here is a nonviolent crime that does not require us to incarcerate people and we are incarcerating at significantly different rate(s) in different communities. “The marijuana example is a perfect example. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) asked Judge Garland about racial disparities in law enforcement general and in cannabis enforcement specifically. Garland has the opportunity to transform the nation’s relationship with cannabis, but a series of important steps are necessary to achieve that goal. Although he took a stand similar to his predecessor, William Barr, that low-level cannabis crimes would not be a priority of the Justice Department, Judge Garland went further, highlighting the inequities in the system and the socioeconomic effects of those law enforcement efforts. ![]() During his confirmation hearing this week, attorney general nominee Merrick Garland spoke openly about his views on cannabis enforcement in the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |